AAA

Is there any room for improvement for university social responsibility? Coopetition as a catalyst.

Elżbieta Karwowska, Krzysztof Leja

Abstract

The modern university, responsible for conducting research and teaching, is especially responsible towards the society. Current articles that refer to the social responsibility of the university focus either on its social, economic, environmental and educational aspects, or on an institutional or systematic level. Authors noticed a lack of articles that refer to an important factor of being socially responsible - the ability and willingness to perform coopetition. Coopetition, also known as a cooperation with competitors, is widely known within the business community. Authors find it suitable also to the academic circles, hence universities can create alliances, compete for resources while cooperating at the same time.

The article is based on the analysis of six case studies of socially responsible universities located in USA, Turkey, New Zealand, Oman, Romania and Poland. The aim of the article is to diagnose the state of the art in the area of university social responsibility and to fill the gap through reflections towards coopetition of the universities. Authors stated three research questions: who are universities responsible to? under what circumstances do they become socially responsible? and what are the dominant practices of socially responsible university? The article closes with a remark that coopetition among universities may be the first step in the process of their consolidation that may be observed in Europe. Authors find this observation a reason to consider the extension of the definition of university social responsibility with the advantages of coopetition.

Keywords: social responsibility, coopetition, contemporary university

References

  • Agoston, S., Dima, A., Vasilache, S., & Ghinea, V. (2013). A Model of Academic Social Responsibility. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, (38), 23-43.
  • Angelidis, J.P., Ibrahim, N.A. (2002). Practical implications of educational back-ground on future corporate executives, Teaching Business Ethics, Vol. 6, 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014266926228.
  • Atakan, M., Eker, T. (2007). Corporate Identity of a Socially Responsible University: A Case from the Turkish Higher Education Sector, Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9274-3.
  • Becher, T., Trowler, P.R. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, Philadelphia: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Bennetot Pruvot, E., Claeys-Kulik, A.-L., Estermann Th., (2015). Designing strategies for efficient funding of universities in Europe. Pobrane z: http://www.eua.be/Libraries/publications-homepage-list/designing-strategies-for-efficient-funding-of-universities-in-europe.pdf?sfvrsn=4. Bruksela: European Universities Association.
  • Benneworth, P., Pinheiro, R., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2016). One size does not fit all! New perspectives on the university in the social knowledge economy, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 43, Iss. 6, 731-735. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw018.
  • Bok, D., (1982). Beyond the ivory tower. Social responsibility of the modern universities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachussets, and London, England.
  • Bouncken, R.B., Gast, J., Kraus S., Bogers, M. (2015). Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis and future research directions, Review Managerial Science, Vol. 9, 577-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0168-6.
  • Carroll, A.B. (1979, 10). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, (4), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850.
  • Carroll A.B. (1991). Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Business Horizons, Vol. 34, Iss. 4, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.
  • Chile, L., Black, X. (2015). University-community engagement: Case study of university social responsibility, Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, 234-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197915607278.
  • Cygler, J. (2009). Kooperencja przedsiębiorstw. Czynniki sektorowe i korporacyjne, Warszawa: Szkoła Główna Handlowa.
  • Czakon, W. (2009). Koopetycja - splot tworzenia i zawłaszczania wartości, Przegląd Organizacji (12), 11-15.
  • Dagiliene, L., Mykolaitiene, V. (2015). Disclosure of Social Responsibility in Annual Performance Reports of Universities, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 213, 586-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.454
  • Dagnino, G.B., Le Roy, F., Yami, S., Czakon, W. (2008). Strategie koopetycji - nowa forma dynami organizacyjnej?, Przegląd Organizacji, (6), 3-7.
  • de Wit, B., Meyer, R. (2014). Strategy synthesis. Managing strategy paradoxes to creative competitive advantage; Delhi: Cengage Learning EMEA.
  • Dryer, J.H., Singh, H. (1998). The relational view Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review Vol. 23, No 4, 660-679. https://doi.org/10.2307/259056.
  • Frederick, W.C. (1998). Creatures, Corporations, Communities, Chaos, Complexity, A Naturological View of the Corporate Social Role, Business & Society, Vol 37, Iss. 4, 358-389 https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039803700403.
  • Freeman, R.E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, The New York Times Magazine, September 13, https://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html.
  • GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf; https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part2-Implementation-Manual.pdf.
  • Harkavy, I. (2006). The role of universities in advancing citizenship and social justice in the 21st century, Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, 5-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197906060711.
  • Hill, R.P. (2004). The Socially-Responsible University: Talking the Talk while Walking the Walk in the College of Business, Journal of Academic Ethics, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000039009.48115.3d.
  • Jarvis, P. (2000). The changing university: meeting a need and needing to change, Higher E-ducation Quarterly, Vol. 54, Iss. 1, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00144.
  • Jónasson, J.T. (2008). Inventing Tomorrow's University. Who is to Take the Lead?, Bologna: Bononia University Press (Chapter 4).
  • Karwowska, E., Leja, K. (2017). Tworzenie sieci współpracy uczelni z otoczeniem przy wykorzystaniu zamówień przedkomercyjnych na przykładzie projektu e-Pionier, e-mentor 2(69), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.15219/em69.1291.
  • L'Etang, J. (1995) Ethical corporate social responsibility: A framework for managers, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872017.
  • Laursen, S.A., Thiry, H., Liston, C.S. (2012). The impact of a university-based school science outreach program on graduate student participants' career paths and professional socialization, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, Vol. 16, No 2, 47-78.
  • Leja, K. (2011). Koncepcje zarządzania współczesnym uniwersytetem. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdańskiej.
  • Lewis, M. (2000). Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 4, 770-776. https://doi.org/10.2307/259204.
  • Magna Charta Universitatum (1988), http://www.magna-charta.org/magna-charta-universitatum [5.09.2018].
  • Melewar, T.C., Akel, S. (2005). The role of corporate identity in the higher education sector. A case study, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280510578196.
  • Metha, S.R. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Universities: Towards an Integrative Approach, International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 1, No. 4, 300-304. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2011.V1.55.
  • Nalebuff, B.J., Brandenburger, A. (1996). Co-opetition. London: Harper Collins Business.
  • Nejati, M., Shafaei, A., Salamzadeh, Y., Daraei M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and universities: a study of top 10 world universities' websites, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, 440-447.
  • Niziałek, I., Kowaluk, G. (2014). An example of Corporate Social Responsibility of university - activity of Faculty of Wood Technology WULS - SGGW. Warszawa: Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences, No. 88, 178-181.
  • Olsen, J.P., Maassen, P. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university' in University Dynamics and European Integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Pinheiro R., Langa P.V., Pausits A. (2015): One and two equals three? The third mission of higher education institutions, European Journal of Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2015.1044552
  • Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2011, 01-02). Creating shared value. Boston: Harvard Business Review, 2-17.
  • Reiser, J. (2007). Managing University Social Responsibility (USR). 2007 Best Practices, Future Challenges ISCN Conference 2007, April 25-27 in Zurich, Switzerland, https://www.international-sustainable-campus-network.org/downloads/conference-and-symposia/iscn-conference-2007/108-panel-b1-juan-reiser-pontificia-universidad-catolica-del-peru/file.
  • Ustawa z 20 lipca 2018 r. Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce. Dz. U. 2018 poz. 1668 z 30 sierpnia 2018 r. http://konstytucjadlanauki.gov.pl/pobierz-ustawe [10.09.2018].
  • Vasilescu, R., Barna, C., Epure, M., Baicu, C. (2010). Developing university social responsibility: A model for the challenges of the new civil society, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, 4177-4182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.660.
  • Wissema, J. (2009). Towards the Third Generation University. Managing the University in Transition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A. (2014). Koopetycja w rozwoju przedsiębiorstw high-tech. Determinanty i dynamika. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Placet.
AUTHORS

Elżbieta Karwowska

Krzysztof Leja

About the article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15219/em75.1357

The article is in the printed version on pages 4-13.

pdf read the article (Polish)

How to cite

Karwowska, E. & Leja, K. (2018). Czy społeczna odpowiedzialność uniwersytetu może być bardziej odpowiedzialna? Szanse wynikające z koopetycji uczelni. e-mentor, 3(75), 4-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15219/em75.1357