E-mentor logo
About the article

DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.15219/em101.1624

The article is in the printed version on pages 11-17.

PDF file Download the article in PDF version
How to cite

Stefańska, M., & Grabowski, G. (2023). Empowerment and the quality of superior-subordinate relationships in the international business environment. e-mentor, 4(101), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.15219/em101.1624

Empowerment and the quality of superior-subordinate relationships in the international business environment

Magdalena Stefańska, Gabriel Grabowski

Trends in management

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to identify and explore nature of superior-subordinate relationship and the different uses of empowerment in organizations where employees and managers are of different nationalities. The hypothesis formulated in the study was that a correct relationship fosters empowerment, but this is conditioned by whether or not the work environment is an international one. The research was conducted using the CAWI technique on a non-randomly selected sample of 277 respondents, and confirms a positive correlation between empowerment and the quality of relationships, and also between empowerment and the type of relationship. Moreover, the perception of relationships is modified when an international working environment is considered. In all models, the formal relationship proves to be an irrelevant factor in the use of empowerment. As far as the origin of the superior is concerned, when the superior is a foreigner, the quality, and not the type of the relationship, is the crucial factor. However, an informal relationship becomes important when there are no foreigners. This may cause certain threats in a situation where the company expands internationally.

Keywords: employee empowerment, formal and informal superior-subordinate relation, quality of relation, international work environment, comparative analysis

References

  • Ahmed, M. M., Chung, K. Y., & Eichenseher, J. W. (2003). Business students' perception of ethics and moral judgment: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022915316112
  • Appelbaum, H., S., Karasek, R., Lapointe, F. & Quelch, K. (2014). Employee empowerment: factors affecting the consequent success or failure - Part I. Industrial and Commercial Training, 46(7), 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-05-2013-0033
  • Bakar, H. A., Mohamad, B., & Mustafa, C. S. (2007). Superior-subordinate communication dimensions and working relationship: Gender preferences in a Malaysian Organization. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750701265282
  • Bartlett, C. A. (1982). How multinational organizations evolve. Journal of Business Strategy, 3(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb038953
  • Bicudo de Castro, V., & Sridharan, V. (2022). Advancing empowerment research in management control: the effects of access to information and deadlines. Pacific Accounting Review, 34(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-05-2020-0052
  • Blanchard, K. (2007). Przywództwo wyższego stopnia. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & van den Heuvel, M. (2015). Leader-member exchange, work engagement, and job performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(7), 754-770. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-03-2013-0088
  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.2307/258093
  • Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. The Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634. https://doi.org/10.2307/258314
  • Fukukawa, K., Shafer, W. E., & Lee, G. M. (2007). Values and attitudes toward social and environmental accountability: A study of MBA students. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(4), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3893-y
  • Glińska-Neweś, A. (2017). Pozytywne relacje w zarządzaniu. Wydawnictwo UMK.
  • Gómez, C., & Rosen, B. (2001). The leader-member exchange as a link between managerial trust and employee empowerment. Group & Organization Management, 26(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601101261004
  • Graen, G., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  • Greasley, K., Bryman, A., Dainty, A., Price, A., Naismith, N. & Soetanto, R. (2008). Understanding empowerment from an employee perspective: What does it mean and do they want it? Team Performance Management, 14(1/2), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590810860195
  • Greasley, K., Bryman, A., Dainty, A., Price, A., Soetanto, R., & King, N. (2005). Employee perceptions of empowerment. Employee Relations, 27(4), 354-368. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450510605697
  • Gregory, K. L. (1983). Native-view paradigms: Multiple cultures and culture conflicts in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 359-376. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392247
  • Harzing, A. W. (2005). The use of English-language questionnaires in cross-national research. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5(2), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595805054494
  • Heckathorn, D. D. (2011). Comment: Snowball versus respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 41(1), 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01244.x
  • Hofstede, G. (2000). Kultury i organizacje. Zaprogramowanie umysłu. PWE.
  • Hopper, P. (2007). Understanding cultural globalization. Polity Press.
  • International differences in ethical standards and in the interpretation of legal frameworks. SATORI Deliverable D3.2 (2015). https://satoriproject.eu/media/D3.2-Int-differences-in-ethical-standards.pdf
  • Juchnowicz, M. (2012). Zaangażowanie pracowników. Sposoby oceny i motywowania. PWE.
  • Klagge, J. (1998). The empowerment squeeze - views from the middle management position. Journal of Management Development, 17,(8), 548-558. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719810228407
  • Klimas, P. (2013). Relacje interpersonalne kadry kierowniczej jako czynnik sprawności sieci. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 3(156), 149-160.
  • Knezović, E., & Drkić, A. (2021). Innovative work behavior in SMEs: the role of transformational leadership. Employee Relations, 43(2), 398-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2020-0124
  • Kumar Pradhan, R., & Panda, M. (2019). Human resource empowerment: Development and validation of a measurement tool. Global Business Review, 3, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918816895
  • Kwok-Bun, Ch., & Peverelli, P. J. (2010). Cultural hybridization: A third way between divergence and convergence. World Futures, 66(3), 219-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604021003680479
  • Leszczyński, G. (2014). Adaptacja w relacjach business-to-business. Uwarunkowania i efekty. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.407
  • Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Managing change: The role of the change agent. International Journal of Management Business, and Administration, 13(1), 1-6.
  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
  • Menon, S. (2001). Employee empowerment: An integrative psychological approach. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(1), 153-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00052
  • Munoz-Doyague, M. F., & Nieto, M. (2012). Individual creativity performance and the quality of interpersonal relationships. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(1), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211193671
  • Pawłowska, A. (2006). Badanie relacji społecznych w organizacji z wykorzystaniem metod projekcyjnych. Studia i Materiały. Wydział Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 1, 7-17.
  • Pelit, E., Öztürk, Y., & Arslantürk, Y. (2011). The effects of employee empowerment on employee job satisfaction: A study on hotels in Turkey. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23(6), 784-802. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111111153475
  • Peterson, R. A., & Merunka, D. R. (2014). Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 1035-1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.010
  • Pistrui, J., & Dimov, D. (2018). The role of a manager has to change in 5 key ways. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/10/the-role-of-a-manager-has-to-change-in-5-key-ways
  • Purgał-Popiela, J. (2012). Ekspatriacja w przedsiębiorstwie międzynarodowym z punktu widzenia centrali i oddziału goszczącego. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 1(3), 199-209.
  • Radstaak, M., & Hennes, A. (2017). Leader-member exchange fosters work engagement: The mediating role of job crafting. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 43, a1458. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v43i0.1458
  • Ratajczak-Mrozek, M. (2010). Sieci biznesowe a przewaga konkurencyjna przedsiębiorstw zaawansowanych technologii na rynkach zagranicznych. Wydawnictwo UE w Poznaniu.
  • Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. A. (2019). Potęga relacji w zarządzaniu. O trudnej sztuce bycia pokornym liderem. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Serrenho, R., Dos Santos, N. R., Dionísio, A., & Da Silva, P. R. (2022). Empowerment at work: An empirical study on empowering leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Positive Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.12775/jpm.2020.004
  • |lusarczyk, Z. (2018). Kierowanie pracownikami: podstawowe relacje w układzie przełożony-podwładny. Zarządzanie Innowacyjne w Gospodarce i Biznesie, 1(26), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.25312/2391-5129.26/2018_31-42
  • Stankiewicz-Mróz, A. (2015). Kontrola versus zaufanie. Nadzór nad pracownikami w erze koncepcji empowerment. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Łódzkiej, Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 60, 169-184. https://repozytorium.p.lodz.pl/bitstream/handle/11652/1168/Kontrola_versus_zaufanie_nadzor_Stankiewicz-Mroz_2015.pdf ZAUFANIE NADZÓR (lodz.pl)
  • Trzcieliński, S., Włodarkiewicz-Klimek, H., & Pawłowski, K. (2013). Współczesne koncepcje zarządzania. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej.

About the authors

Magdalena Stefańska

The author, PhD., Head of the Department of Strategic Management at Poznań University of Economics and Business. For many years, the author's research interests have focused on the issues of corporate social responsibility and sustainable development and consumption. She is the author of several dozen scientific publications in this field. In her research, she addresses issues such as the social responsibility of organizations towards employees, employer brand, and creating the image of the organization. She is a member of the PUEB Social Responsibility Committee, the Scientific Research Ethics Committee, and the Working Group for University Social Responsibility at the Ministry of Funds and Regional Policy.

Gabriel Grabowski

The author, PhD. in management, also holds a master's degree in environmental engineering. He got his doctor's degree at Poznań University of Economics and Business in 2023 and the subject of his dissertation was the significance of the superior-subordinate relationship for employee commitment in the environment of international organizations. He focuses on sustainable development issues and has more than ten years of managerial experience in international enterprises operating in the fields of renewable energy and environmental protection. In addition to professional life, post-secondary and university lecturing is an important part of his activity.