AAA

Methods of risk management in implementation of innovative technical products

Ludmiła Walaszczyk

In the process of developing innovative technical products it is difficult to constantly assess those products considering the factors influencing the possibility of their implementation into economy. The aim of the article is to propose the methodology to assess risk management during implementation of innovative technical products designed by both, research institutions and enterprises. The problems linked with the implementation of the products were identified. The author also identified key risk groups and undesirable situations. Moreover, the way to determine the probability of undesirable situations occurrence was indicated. The proposed methodology was verified based on more than 100 innovative technical products from Innovative Systems of Technical Support for Sustainable Development of Economy Strategic Research Programme. Strong and weak points of the methodology were identified. Among advantages, the possibility of assessing in different timeframes and applying homogeneous criteria of the assessment were pointed. The lack of possibility to obtain aggregated result and inability of full result objectivity due to the use of semi-quantitative method were recognized.

Bibliography

  • A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 5th Edition, Project Management Institute, 2012.
  • A risk management standard, Institute of Risk Management, 2002.
  • Becker J., Analiza funkcjonalna metod ilościowych na potrzeby systemu wspomagania decyzji (część I), „Metody Ilościowe w Badaniach Ekonomicznych” 2011, t. XII, nr 2, s. 21-36.
  • Bieda B., Metoda Monte Carlo w ocenie niepewności w stochastycznej analizie procesów wytwórczych i ekologii, Wydawnictwo AGH, Kraków 2010.
  • Dubisz S. (red.), Słownik języka polskiego, PWN, Warszawa 2006.
  • Encyklopedia Zarządzania, http://mfiles.pl/pl/index.php/Drzewo_decyzyjne.
  • Greco S. (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, „International Series in Operations Research & Management Science”, 2016.
  • Haimes Y.Y., Hierarchical holographic modelling, „IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics” 1981, Vol. 11, No. 9, s. 606-617, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1981.4308759.
  • Haimes Y.Y., Risk modelling, assessment, and management, John Wiley, New York 1998.
  • Hulett D., Practical schedule risk analysis, Gower Publishing Company, 2009, s. 208.
  • Juselius K., The cointegrated VaR model: methodology and applications, Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • Kaczmarek T., Ryzyko i zarządzanie ryzykiem. Ujęcie interdyscyplinarne, Difin, Warszawa 2005.
  • Kisielnicki J., Zarządzanie projektami badawczo-rozwojowymi, Wolters Kluwer Business, Warszawa 2013.
  • M_o_R 2010 - Management of Risk: Guidance for Practitioners, 2010.
  • Nahotko S., Ryzyko ekonomiczne w działalności gospodarczej, Oficyna Wydawnicza Ośrodka Postępu Organizacyjnego, Bydgoszcz 2001.
  • Oslo Manual Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition, OECD, Eurostat, 2005, s. 47-52.
  • Pfeffer I., Insurance and Economic Theory, Illinois 1956.
  • Portal Innowacji, Zarządzanie ryzykiem w projektach innowacyjnych, http://www.pi.gov.pl/PARP/chapter_86197.asp?soid=0CA59D0084174201BA6A9E770D6BE5AB.
AUTHOR

Ludmiła Walaszczyk

The Institute for Sustainable Technologies – National Research Institute in Radom

Table of contents

About the article

DOI: 10.15219/em64.1237

The article is in the printed version on pages 34-43.

pdf download PDF

pdf read the article (Polish)

Citation