AAA

BPMN versus data dimension - limitations and complementary notations

Bartosz Marcinkowski, Bartłomiej Gawin

The current paper is aimed at bridging the gap between the contribution of academia and practice in respect of data specifications in regard to the implementation of analytical models in business process engines in the subsequent stages of increasing process maturity of business organization. The issues of identifying structural relationships between documents, building structural data- and documents model within the organization as well as managing complexity of such a model remain intentionally outside the scope of Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Thus, the effectiveness of achieving the level of executable business processes is largely dependent on the proper selection and introduction of notations that are complementary to the process dynamics modeling standard. Within the paper a set of potential complementary techniques, including proprietary UML profile for BPMN data modeling (BPMNDoc), is proposed. Authors conduct a comparative analysis of the techniques as well as provide an exemplification and data specifications based on a case study of site acceptance process in a telecommunications company.

Bibliography

  • R.S. Aguilar-Saven, Business Process Modelling: Review and Framework, „International Journal of Production Economics” 2004, No. 90, s. 129-149.
  • Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Version 2.0.2, Object Management Group, 2013, http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/.
  • Business Process Reengineering and Beyond, International Technical Support Oganization, IBM, 2013 http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg242590.pdf.
  • H. Chestnut, Systems Engineering Methods, Wiley, 1967.
  • B. Dobing, J. Parsons, How UML is Used, „Communications of ACM” 2006, Vol. 49, No. 5, s. 109-113.
  • T. Dufresne, J. Martin, Process Modeling for E-Business, INFS 770 Methods for Information Systems Engineering: Knowledge Management and E-Business, 2003.
  • H. Eriksson, M. Penker, Business Modeling with UML: Business Patterns at Work, Wiley, 2000.
  • B. Gawin, B. Marcinkowski, Symulacja procesów biznesowych. Standardy BPMS i BPMN w praktyce, Helion, Gliwice 2013.
  • W. Hongli, Y. Baolin, Z. Xia, X. Gang, Data Description and Data Access Mechanism in Distributed Workflow System, Beihang University, 2007.
  • Information technology - Object Management Group Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML) - Part 2: Superstructure (ISO/IEC 19505-2:2012). Version 2.4.1, 2012, http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/ISO/19505-2/PDF/.
  • ISO 5807:1985. Information processing - Documentation symbols and conventions for data, program and system flowcharts, program network charts and system resources charts, 1985, http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/ catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=11955.
  • S. Johnston, Rational UML Profile for Business Modeling, 2004, http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/5167.html.
  • A. Kalnins, D. Kalnina, A. Kalis, Comparison of Tools and Languages for Business Process Reengineering, [w:] D.H. Withers, R.N. Zobel (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Baltic Workshop on Databases and Information Systems; IEEE Computer Society, 1998.
  • D. Karagiannis, S. Junginger, R. Strobl, Introduction to Business Process Management System Concepts, [w:] B. Scholz-Reiter, E. Stickel (eds.), Business Process Modelling; Springer-Verlag, 1996.
  • W. Kowalczewski, J. Nazarka (red.), Instrumenty zarządzania współczesnym przedsiębiorstwem, Difin, Warszawa 2006.
  • J. Krogstie, Using EEML for Combined Goal and Process Oriented Modeling: A Case Study, [w:] T. Halpin, J. Krogstie, E. Proper (eds.), Proceedings of EMMSAD'08. Thirteenth International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design, Montpellier 2008.
  • R.J. Mayer et al., Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering (IICE) IDEF3 Process Description Capture Method Report, 1995, http://www.idef.com/pdf/Idef3_fn.pdf.
  • M. Odeh, I. Beeson, S. Green, J. Sa, Modelling Processes Using RAD and UML Activity Diagrams: an Exploratory Study, 2002, http://www.cems.uwe.ac.uk/~sjgreen/RAD&AD_V2.pdf.
  • C.A. Petri, Kommunikation mit Automaten; Universität Bonn, 1962.
  • S. Sadiq, M. Orlowska, W. Sadiq, C. Foulger; Data Flow and Validation in Workflow Modelling, University of Queensland, 2004.
  • A.W. Scheer, Architecture of Integrated Information Systems, Springer-Verlag, 2002.
  • S. Wrycza, B. Marcinkowski, UML 2 Academic Course - Methodological Background and Survey Benchmarking, [w:] Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference for Information Systems Educators. Volume 23, AITP Foundation for Information Technology Education, 2006.
  • S. Wrycza, B. Marcinkowski, J. Maślankowski, UML 2.x. Ćwiczenia zaawansowane, Helion, Gliwice 2012.
  • E. Yourdon, Współczesna analiza strukturalna, Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne, Warszawa 1996.

AUTHORS

BARTOSZ MARCINKOWSKI

University of Gdańsk











BARTŁOMIEJ GAWIN

University of Gdańsk

Table of contents

About the article

DOI: 10.15219/em54.1096

The article is in the printed version on pages 57-67.

pdf download PDF

pdf read the article (Polish)

Citation

B. Marcinkowski, B. Gawin, BPMN a wymiar danych - ograniczenia i notacje komplementarne, „e-mentor” 2014, nr 2 (54), s. 57-67, http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/54/id/1096.