Abstract

The paper presents the first cohort of the innovative project “European Engineering Team”, which was conducted within the ERASMUS+ program. The innovativeness of the project lies in the cooperation of 4 European universities of technology and its project-based approach. Students participating in the EET project independently defined problem domains related to sustainability. The mobility attributed to regular ERASMUS+ initiatives was redefined. Students and supervisors had to travel frequently for short periods (4 week-long meetings), reflecting the actual needs and demands of a global labor market. Students cooperate virtually and attend classes in their regular courses at home universities between direct meetings. The goal of this project was to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach to transnational and inter-university initiatives, utilizing blended learning. The goal was to develop student competencies in terms of sustainability, cooperation in transnational and geographically dispersed teams, who worked on multi-disciplinary problems utilizing knowledge from different domains. The approach was effective and most of the student competences improved throughout the project. However, some areas of possible improvement were defined and supervisors are focused on them during the ongoing second cohort of the EET.

Keywords: project-based learning; experiential learning; blended learning; transnational cooperation; short-period mobility

References

• Beaver, J.K., Hallar, B., Westmaas, L. (2014). Blended learning. Defining models and examining conditions to support implementation.
• Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning environments: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco (CA): Pfeiffer.
• Claesson, A.N., Svanstrom, M. (2015). Developing systems thinking for sustainable development in engineering education. Proceedings of EESD'15. DOI: 10.14288/1.0064722.
• Dewey, J. (2007). Education and experience (1^st Touchstone Edition eBook). New York: Si-mon and Schuster.
• Flores, R.I., Soto, C.M., Holliger, C. (2012). Internationalization and transdisciplinary education in design: success factors and pitfalls. Strategic Design Research Journal, 5(2), 70-74.
• Gharfalkar, M., Court, R., Campbell, C., Ali, Z., Hillier, G. (2015). Analysis of waste hierarchy in the European waste directive 2008/98/EC. Waste Management, 39, 305-313.
• Gladysz, B., Urgo, M., Gaspari, L., Pozzan, G., Stock, T., Haskins, C., Jarzebowska, E., Kohl, H. (2018). Sustainable Innovation in a Multi-University Master Course. Procedia Manufactur-ing, 21, 18-25.
• Haskins, C., Stock, T., Gladysz, B., Urgo, M. (2017). Disciplinary Convergence: Implications for Systems Engineering Research. A.M. Madni, B. Boehm, D.A. Erwin, R. Ghanem, M.J. Wheaton (Eds.). Proceedings of the 15^th CSER, 1095-1106.
• Jack, H., Mott., R, Raju, V., Conkol, G., Stratton, M., Waldrop, P., Wosczyna-Birch, K., Bates, S. (2011). Curricula 2015; A Four Year Strategic Plan Manufacturing Education. Re-trieved from: https://sites.google.com/site/curricula2015.
• European Commission (2010). Strategia na rzecz inteligentnego i zrównoważonego rozwoju sprzyjającego włączeniu społecznemu. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/1_PL_ACT_part1_v1.pdf.
• Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.
• Kolb, D.A. (2015). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development, 2^nd edition. Upper Saddle River (NY): Pearson Education.
• Kurtz, B., Fenwick, J. Jr, Ellsworth, C., Yuan, X., Steele, A., Jia, X. (2007). Inter-University software engineering using web services. I. Russell, S. Haller, J.D. Dougherty, S. Rodger, G. Lewandowski (Eds.). Proceedings of the 38^th SIGCSE, 464-468.
• Lane, T.J. (1994). Educating European Construction Managers of the Future: The Development of a Transnational Taught Master's Course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 19(4), 443-448. DOI: 10.1080/03043799408923311.
• MacLeod, I.A. (2010). The education of innovative engineers. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 17(1), 21-34.
• May, D., Wold, K.A., Moore, S.L. (2014). Developing Cultural Competencies through Trans-national Learning Experiences in Active Online Learning Environments. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 4(5), 12-19.
• Oladiran, M.T., Uziak, J., Eisenberg, M., Scheffer, C. (2011). Global Engineering Teams - A Programme Promoting Teamwork in Engineering Design and Manufacturing. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2), 173-186.
• Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C., Damian, D., Raty, P., Schroter, A. (2013). Teaching students global software engineering skills using distributed Scrum. D. Notkin, B.H.C. Cheng, K. Pohl (Eds.). Proceedings of the 35^th ICSE, 1128-1137.
• Paci, A.M., Lalle, C., Chiacchio, M.S. (2013). Education for innovation: trends, collaborations and views. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(3), 487-493. DOI: 10.1007/s10845-012-0631-z.
• Petrea, E., Velescu. E. (2014). An Example of Science Students' Interaction in a Foreign Language for the Implementation of Inter-university Research Projects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 707-711. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.124.
• Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. R.E. Ripple, V.N. Rockcastle (Eds.). Piaget Re-discovered: A Report on the Conference of Cognitive Studies and Curriculum Development, 7-20.
• Sanderson, H. (2017). Bottom-up Climate Adaptation Strategies towards a Sustainable Eu-rope. Impact, 1, 63-65.
• Schein, E.H. (1996). Kurt Lewin's change theory in the field and in the classroom: notes to-ward a model of managed learning. Systems practice, 1, 27-47.
• Sharma, B., Steward, B., Ong, S.K., Miguez, F.E. (2017). Evaluation of teaching approach and student learning in a multidisciplinary sustainable engineering course. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 4032-4040.
• Stock, T., Kohl, H. (2018). Perspectives for International Engineering Education: Sustainable-oriented and Transnational Teaching and Learning. Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 10-17.
• Stock, T., Seliger, G. (2016), Methodology for the Development of Hardware Startups. Advanced Materials Research, 1140, 505-512.
• Stock, T., Haskins, C., Gladysz, B., Urgo, M., Kohl, H. (2017). A guideline for planning and implementing an action-based and transnational course in higher engineering education: A Case for Sustainable Value Creation. J.C. Quadrado, J. Bernardino, J. Rocha (Eds.). Proceedings of the 45^th SEFI Annual Conference, 33-40.
• Stock, T., Haskins, C., Gładysz, B., Urgo, M., Kohl, H., Strandhagen, J.O., Jarzębowska, E., Tolio, T. (2016). Development of a Project-Oriented and Transnational Master Course for Training the Engineering Competencies Required in an Increasingly Demanding Work-life in Europe. Proceedings of the 44th SEFI Annual Conference. 1-13.
• Tuckman, B.W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399. DOI: 10.1037/h0022100.
• UN (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals.
• Vernon, J. (2000). Engineering Education: finding the centre or 'back to the future'. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(3), 215-225.
• D.D. Walden, G.J. Roedler, K.J. Forsberg, R.D. Hamelin, T.M. Shortell (Eds.) (2015). Sys-tems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, 4th ed. Hoboken (NY): John Wiley & Sons.
• Ziemian, C.W., Sharma, M.M. (2007). Adapting Learning Factory Concepts Towards Integrated Manufacturing Education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(1), 199-210.