The role of the work places structure in intraorganizational knowledge sharing - a case study

Aleksandra Rudawska

Knowledge flow between employees is an important process that influences both effectiveness and innovativeness. Among the antecedences of the employees' knowledge sharing behaviour are the physical structure of the organization and the decisions concerning placement of individuals in the work space. The paper examines how organizational architecture and location of employees is related with different types of knowledge sharing. In this case study research the work place observation and content analysis of interviewees were applied. The study was done in the Quality Department in Polish subsidiary of multinational concern. It turned out that where there was the greater physical distance between employees and limited visual contact, the responsive knowledge sharing was favoured. Moreover, the more open was the work space where employees from different departments were located, the employees looked for the cloistered areas to share knowledge and that process was less spontaneous. In order to eliminate the spatial constrains to knowledge sharing, the group leaders in the department, regularly organized meetings facilitating knowledge flow in the groups.


  • Allen T.J., Architecture and communication among product development engineers, "California Management Review" 2007, Vol. 49, No. 2, s. 23-41,
  • Appel-Meulenbroek R., Groenen P., Janssen I., An end-user's perspective on activity-based office concepts, "Journal of Corporate Real Estate" 2011, Vol. 13, No. 2, s. 122-135.
  • Bartol K.M., Srivastava A., Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward system, "Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies" 2002, Vol. 9, No. 1, s. 64-76,
  • Becker F., Sims W., Offices that work: balancing cost, flexibility and communication, Cornell University International Workplace Studies Program, 2001,
  • Berends H., van der Bij H., Debackere K., Weggeman M., Knowledge sharing mechanisms in industrial research, "R&D Management" 2006, Vol. 36, No. 1, s. 85-95,
  • Bergström J., Miller M., Horneij E., Work environment perceptions following relocation to open-plan offices: A twelve-month longitudinal study, "Work" 2015, Vol. 50, No. 2, s. 221-228.
  • Bernstein E.S., The transparency paradox: a role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control, "Administrative Science Quarterly" 2012, Vol. 57, No. 2, s. 181-216,
  • Blumberg M., Pringle C., The missing opportunity in organizational research: some implications for the theory of work performance, "Academy of Management Review" 1982, Vol. 7, No. 4, s: 560-569,
  • Boutellier R., Ullman F., Schreiber J., Naef R., Impact of office layout on communication in a science-driven business, "R&D Management" 2008, Vol. 38, No. 4, s. 372-391,
  • Carlile P.R., Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries, "Organization Science" 2004, Vol. 15, No. 5, s. 555-568,
  • Chen C.J., Hung S.W., To give or to receive? Factors influencing members' knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities, "Information and Management" 2010, Vol. 47, s. 226-236.
  • Congdon C., Flynn D., Redman M., Balancing "we" and "me": the best collaborative spaces also support solitude, "Harvard Business Review" 2014, Vol. 92, No. 10, s. 50-57.
  • Coradi A., Heinzen M., Boutellier R., Designing workspaces for cross-functional knowledge-sharing in R&D: the "co-location pilot" of Novartis, "Journal of Knowledge Management 2015, Vol. 19, No. 2, s. 236-256,
  • Cross R., Cummings J.N., Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work, "Academy of Management Journal" 2004, Vol. 47, No. 6, s. 928-937,
  • Cummings J.L., Teng B.S., The keys to successful knowledge-sharing, "Journal of General Management" 2006, Vol. 31, No.4, s. 1-18,
  • Czakon W., Zastosowanie studiów przypadku w badaniach nauk o zarządzaniu, [w:] W. Czakon (red.), Podstawy metodologii badań w naukach o zarządzaniu, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2013, s. 95.
  • Fayard A.L., Weeks J., Photocopiers and water-cooler. The affordances of informal interactions, "Organization Studies" 2007, Vol. 28, No. 5, s. 605-634,
  • Fayard A.L., Weeks J., Who moved my cube?, "Harvard Business Review" 2011, Vol. 89, No. 7/8, s. 104-105.
  • Foss N.J., Husted K., Michailova S., Governing Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: Levels of Analysis, Governance Mechanisms, and Research Directions, "Journal of Management Studies" 2010, Vol. 47, No. 3, s. 455-482,
  • Foss N.J., Minbaeva D.B., Pedersen T., Reinholt M., Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: how job design matters, "Human Resource management" 2009, Vol. 48, No. 6, s. 871-893,
  • Gillen M.N., The future workplace, opportunities, realities and myths: a practical approach to creating meaningful environments, [w:] J. Worthinghton (red.), Reinventing the workplace, Architectural Press, Oxford 2006, s. 64-65.
  • Haas M.R., Hansen M.T., Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations, "Strategic Management Journal" 2007, Vol. 28, No. 11, s. 1133-1153,
  • Hansen M.T., The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits, "Administrative Science Quarterly" 1999, Vol. 44, No. 1, s. 82-111,
  • Hatch M.J., Physical Barriers, Task Characteristics and Interaction Activity in Research and Development Firms, "Administrative Science Quarterly" 1987, Vol. 32, No. 3, s. 387-399,
  • Hatch M.J., Teoria organizacji, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2002, s. 244.
  • Hong D., Suh E., Koo C., Developing strategies for overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing based on conversational knowledge management" a case study of financial company, "Expert Systems with Applications" 2011, Vol. 38, s. 14417-14427.
  • van den Hooff B., de Ridder J.A., Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing, "Journal of Knowledge Management" 2004, Vol. 8, No. 6, s. 117-130,
  • Ipe M., Knowledge sharing in Organizations: a conceptual framework, "Human Resource Development Review" 2003, Vol. 2, No. 4, s. 337-359,
  • Jemielniak D., Badania jakościowe. Metody i narzędzia. Tom 2, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2012, s. 32-34.
  • Kelloway E.K., Barling J., Knowledge work as organizational behavior, "International Journal of Management Reviews" 2000, Vol. 2, No. 3, s. 287-304,
  • Kiesler S., Cummings J., What do we know about proximity in work groups? A Legacy of Research, [w:] P. Hinds, S. Kiesler (red.), Distributed Work, MIT Press, Cambridge 2002, s. 64-67.
  • von Krogh G., Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: The role of communities, [w:] M. Easterby-Smith, M.A. Lyles (red.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, John Wiley & Sons, New York 2011, s. 405-406.
  • Kumari N., Takahashi Y., Meta-analytic review of the antecedents of knowledge sharing: Focus on public vs. private organizations and IT vs non-IT facilitation, "International Business Research" 2014, Vol. 7, No. 12, s. 29-43,
  • Laing A., New patterns of work: the design of the office, [w:] J. Worthinghton (red.), Reinventing the workplace, Architectural Press, Oxford 2006, s. 64-65.
  • Lenkiewicz M., Activity Based Working: czas na zmiany w miejscu pracy, "Harvard Business Review Polska"
  • Nonaka I., Toyama R., Konno N., SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation, "Long Range Planning" 2000, Vol. 33, No. 1, s. 5-34,
  • Oldham G.R., Brass D.J. Employee reactions to an open-plan office: a naturally occurring quasi-experiment, "Administrative Science Quarterly" 1979, Vol. 24, No. 2, s. 267-284,
  • Piasecki P., Partycypacja pracownicza w modelu, podejmowania decyzji a satysfakcja z pracy w MŚP - analiza relacji z wykorzystaniem modelu AMO, "Organizacja i Kierowanie" 2014, nr 3, s. 88.
  • Reinholt M., Pedersen T., Foss N.J., Why a central network position isn't enough: the role of motivation and ability for knowledge sharing in employee networks, "Academy of Management Journal" 2011, Vol. 54, No. 6, s. 1277-1297,
  • Rudawska A., Dzielenie się wiedzą w organizacjach - istota, bariery i efekty, "Organizacja i Kierowanie" 2013, nr 4, s. 93-94.
  • Siemsen E., Roth A.V., Balasubramanian S., How motivation, opportunity, and ability drive knowledge sharing: the constraining-factor model, "Journal of Operations Management" 2008, Vol. 26, No. 3, s. 426-445,
  • Smith-Jackson T., Middlebrooks R., Francis J., Gray T., Nelson K., Steele B., Townsend K., Watlington C., Open plan offices as sociotechnical systems: What matters and to whom?, "Work" 2016, Vol. 54, No. 4, s. 807-823,
  • Sundstrom E., Sundstrom M.G., Work places: the psychology of physical environment in offices and factories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993.
  • Szulanski G., The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness, "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes" 2000, Vol. 82, No. 1, s. 9-27,
  • Teng J.T.T., Song S., An exploratory examination of knowledge-sharing behaviors: solicited and voluntary, "Journal of Knowledge Management" 2011, Vol. 15, No. 1, s. 104-117,
  • Wang S., Noe R.A., Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research, "Human Resource Management Review" 2010, Vol. 20, No. 2, s. 115-131,
  • Witherspoon C.L., Bergner J., Cockrell C., Stone D.N., Antecedents of organizational knowledge sharing: a meta-analysis and critique, "Journal of Knowledge Management" 2012, Vol. 17, No. 2, s. 250-277,
  • Yi J., A measure of knowledge sharing behaviour: scale development and validation, "Knowledge Management Research and Practice" 2009, Vol. 7, No. 1, s. 69-70.
  • Yin R.K., Case study research. Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Sage, 2009, s. 47-49.
  • Zhang X., Jiang J.Y., With whom shall I share my knowledge? A recipient perspective of knowledge sharing, "Journal of Knowledge Management" 2015, Vol. 19, No. 2, s. 277-295,

Aleksandra Rudawska

Table of contents

About the article

DOI: 10.15219/em69.1299

The article is in the printed version on pages 48-59.

pdf read the article (Polish)